← The Peninsula Wire
Public Safety

Port Angeles PD Updates ERPO Policy

πŸ”Š Listen Β· narrated by Aiden

Port Angeles Police Department has updated its policy manual to clarify procedures for extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) and firearm removal.

The policy, numbered 342.1, defines ERPOs as court orders prohibiting individuals from having firearms if deemed a risk to themselves or others. It specifies that officers must remove firearms when there is probable cause of domestic violence and a court order requires immediate surrender.

The policy incorporates state laws including RCW 9.41.800 and RCW 10.99.030, which mandate firearm removal in domestic violence cases. The policy also defines key terms like 'intimate partner' and 'family or household members' under Washington State law.

πŸ“„ Source: Local Government β€” https://www.cityofpa.us/DocumentCenter/View/18000/Extreme-Risk-Protection-Order-Policy
Checked against the public record10 of 14 claims Β· 71%

Every factual claim below was checked against the original public record. Source: original document β†—

  • ⚠
    Port Angeles Police Department has updated its policy manualβ€œnull”
  • ⚠
    The policy manual update clarifies procedures for extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs)β€œnull”
  • ⚠
    The policy manual update clarifies procedures for firearm removalβ€œnull”
  • ⚠
    The policy is numbered 342.1β€œnull”
  • βœ“
    The policy defines ERPOs as court orders prohibiting individuals from having firearmsβ€œExtreme risk protection order – An order prohibiting a named person from having custody or control, purchasing, possessing, accessing, receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive firearms.”
  • βœ“
    The policy defines ERPOs as court orders prohibiting individuals from having firearms if deemed a risk to themselves or othersβ€œThe purpose of a Washington State RCW (Revised Code of Washington) for an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) is to temporarily prevent an individual deemed at high risk of harming themselves or others from accessing firearms.”
  • βœ“
    The policy specifies that officers must remove firearms when there is probable cause of domestic violenceβ€œFirearms must be removed when there is probable cause that a crime of domestic violence has been committed and that firearms are to be immediately relinquished to law enforcement when a person is served with either an OTSPW or an ERPO.”
  • βœ“
    The policy specifies that officers must remove firearms when a court order requires immediate surrenderβ€œFirearms must be removed when there is probable cause that a crime of domestic violence has been committed and that firearms are to be immediately relinquished to law enforcement when a person is served with either an OTSPW or an ERPO.”
  • βœ“
    The policy incorporates state laws including RCW 9.41.800β€œThis policy incorporates the definitions related to Civil Protection Orders under RCW 7.105.010 and definitions related to criminal DV underRCW 10.99.020.”
  • βœ“
    The policy incorporates state laws including RCW 10.99.030β€œThese mandates are found in RCW 10.99.030, 7.105, 9.41.800, and 9.41.801. This policy incorporates the definitions related to Civil Protection Orders under RCW 7.105.010 and definitions related to criminal DV underRCW 10.99.020.”
  • βœ“
    RCW 9.41.800 mandates firearm removal in domestic violence casesβ€œThe purpose of a Washington State Order to Surrender and Prohibit Weapons (under RCW 9.41.800) is to protect individuals by requiring a person to immediately surrender all firearms and dangerous weapons and to prevent them from acquiring any more weapons. This order is issued by a court in situations involving domestic violence, stalking, or other threats to a person's safety, and is a critical step in ensuring compliance with a protection or restraining order.”
  • βœ“
    RCW 10.99.030 mandates firearm removal in domestic violence casesβ€œFirearms must be removed when there is probable cause that a crime of domestic violence has been committed and that firearms are to be immediately relinquished to law enforcement when a person is served with either an OTSPW or an ERPO. These mandates are found in RCW 10.99.030, 7.105, 9.41.800, and 9.41.801.”
  • βœ“
    The policy defines key terms like 'intimate partner' under Washington State lawβ€œAccording to RCW 7.105.010 (21) (21) "Intimate partner" means: (a) Spouses or domestic partners; (b) former spouses or former domestic partners; (c) persons who have a child in common regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time, unless the child is conceived through sexual assault; or (d) persons who have or have had a dating relationship where both persons are at least 13 years of age or older.”
  • βœ“
    The policy defines key terms like 'family or household members' under Washington State lawβ€œAccording to RCW 7.105.010 (14) "Family or Household Members" (14) "Family or household members" means: (a) Persons related by blood, marriage, domestic partnership, or adoption; (b) persons who currently or formerly resided together; (c) persons who have a biological or legal parent-child relationship, including stepparents and stepchildren and grandparents and grandchildren, or a parent's intimate partner and children; and (d) a person who is acting or has acted as a legal guardian.”

The Peninsula Wire is free. Get Olympic Peninsula's news delivered every morning.